Arguing Marbury V. Madison - Paperback
$38.55 USD
Passer aux informations sur le produit
Arguing Marbury V. Madison - Paperback
$38.55 USD
Expédition calculée lors du paiement.
by Mark Tushnet (Editor)
Marbury v. Madison, decided in 1803, is the foundation stone of the American doctrine of judicial review. Remarkably, the case was decided without the parties having presented an oral argument to the Supreme Court. This book begins with a unique transcript of an oral argument in the case, conducted before a bench of four distinguished federal judges. The transcript is followed by essays on Marburys intellectual background, its significance in U.S. constitutional history, and the way in which we might think of constitutional theory and judicial review in terms sensitive to the historical and political contexts in which the practice persists. Distinguished commentators question some of the claims made in the essays, and offer their own perspectives on Marburys importance.
Front Jacket
Marbury v. Madison, decided in 1803, is the foundation stone of the American doctrine of judicial review. Remarkably, the case was decided without the parties having presented an oral argument to the Supreme Court. This book begins with a unique transcript of an oral argument in the case, conducted before a bench of four distinguished federal judges. The transcript is followed by essays on Marbury's intellectual background, its significance in U.S. constitutional history, and the way in which we might think of constitutional theory and judicial review in terms sensitive to the historical and political contexts in which the practice persists. Distinguished commentators question some of the claims made in the essays, and offer their own perspectives on Marbury's importance.
Back Jacket
Marbury v. Madison, decided in 1803, is the foundation stone of the American doctrine of judicial review. Remarkably, the case was decided without the parties having presented an oral argument to the Supreme Court. This book begins with a unique transcript of an oral argument in the case, conducted before a bench of four distinguished federal judges. The transcript is followed by essays on Marbury's intellectual background, its significance in U.S. constitutional history, and the way in which we might think of constitutional theory and judicial review in terms sensitive to the historical and political contexts in which the practice persists. Distinguished commentators question some of the claims made in the essays, and offer their own perspectives on Marbury's importance.
Author Biography
Mark Tushnet is Carmack Waterhouse Professor of Constitutional Law at Georgetown University.
Number of Pages: 224
Dimensions: 0.49 x 8.96 x 6.08 IN
Publication Date: August 09, 2005
Détails
Ce produit est fabriqué avec des matériaux de qualité pour garantir sa durabilité et ses performances. Conçu pour votre confort, il s'intègre parfaitement à votre quotidien.
Livraison et retours
Nous nous efforçons de traiter et d'expédier toutes les commandes dans les meilleurs délais, en travaillant avec diligence pour que vos articles vous parviennent le plus rapidement possible.
Nous nous engageons à offrir une expérience d'achat positive à tous nos clients. Si, pour une raison quelconque, vous souhaitez retourner un article, nous vous invitons à contacter notre équipe pour obtenir de l'aide. Nous évaluerons chaque demande de retour avec soin et considération.
Découvrir toute la collection
